Keepin’ it real.
Next mailblog: Tuesday. Send ‘em in.
Eric S. from St. Paul, Minn., writes: I have to disagree with your team secondary rankings in regards to your number two ranked, Ohio State, pick. OSU loses three starters and you place them above such teams as Nebraska and Wisconsin. Last year, Nebraska had a higher ranked pass defense than OSU, return more starting experience not to mention the number one ranked cornerback on your 2011 board while Wisconsin has more secondary players ranked in your top ten (3) than OSU (2). I understand OSU has some highly-touted young(er) players but proven experience should always rank higher than hype. In my opinion, your ranking is a traditional “safe” pick, which at least you admit with your “this is a group the Buckeyes rarely have…
Continue reading at ESPN.com – Big Ten – Blog
No related posts.
